Fighting for Accessibility on Campus

Katie Scanlon

Last September, disabled students and their allies at the University of Birmingham held a protest against campus inaccessibility, and what they saw as the university’s lack of support for its disabled students. Charging the university with “institutional ableism,” the Disability and Mental Health Students Association (DAMSA) demanded change.

Of the three broad issues leading to the protest, physical accessibility is top of the list. The university does provide an online map for wheelchair users and other disabled people to follow. But as I discovered from one student, who wanted to stay anonymous, taking this route can prolong each journey significantly. “Last year in January, I injured my shoulder and consequently I had to use the more accessible routes,” they told me. “I was shocked about how much more I had to think about getting to class.”

Digital accessibility—the ability to access academic content online if someone cannot make it onto campus—is just as important. Jay (not their real name), a DAMSA spokesperson, told me that on some days they can make it to their lectures and seminars. On others, their body will not let them. No student should be discriminated against because they physically cannot make it onto campus. So lecturers need to ensure their content is being recorded or noted so that disabled students can access the material they have paid for.

The university must make fundamental changes to reverse the poor the treatment and inclusion of disabled students and moving forward must be proactive rather than reactive at addressing issues.”
Disability and Mental Health Students Association (DAMSA)

DAMSA also criticised the university’s insistence on a formal diagnosis before offering provisions such as extra time for exams, extensions for projects, and digital resources. This policy, they say, is putting some students at a disadvantage, making their education harder. Jay also told me that being disabled limits the scope of their studies. Some modules are only available to those who can access the seminars in person, which is just not possible for some students.

In response to the protest, the university has formed a new Disabled Students Contribution group—a platform for students to raise concerns and discuss issues together. These sessions will feed back to the Accessibility Oversight Group, a panel with four student representatives that can make recommendations to the university. “There has yet to be evidence that these groups are effective,” said DAMSA. The university, they said, “must make fundamental changes to reverse the poor the treatment and inclusion of disabled students and moving forward must be proactive rather than reactive at addressing issues.”

A university spokesperson told me, “We are passionate about supporting all members of our community who identify as having a disability, ensuring we do everything we can to remove any barriers to the full university experience for students, staff, and visitors… University representatives have met with members of the DAMSA Committee and with a wider group of students at a new Disabled Students Contribution Group to highlight and prioritise a range of issues where we can work together to enhance the disabled student experience.”

This Article Appears In

Tower Volume 1 Spring 2023